Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 313
Filtrar
1.
Pituitary ; 27(2): 197-203, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38345719

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Impulse control disorders (ICDs) have been described as underrecognized side effects of dopamine agonists (DAs) in neurological disorders but are not sufficiently understood in endocrine conditions. OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence of DAs induced ICDs and determine potential risk factors related to these disorders in patients with prolactinoma and non-function pituitary adenomas (NFPAs). METHODS: This is a cross-sectional multicenter study involving 200 patients with prolactinoma and NFPAs, who received follow-ups in tertiary referral centers. DA-induced ICDs were assessed using ICD questionnaires modified from prior studies. RESULT: At least one ICD was reported by 52% of participants, among whom 28.5% mentioned compulsive shopping, 24.5% punding, and 24.5% hypersexuality. Furthermore, 33% of the patients reported the presence of one type of ICD behavior, while 12% specified two and 7% had three types of such behavior. The multivariable logistic regression showed that the significant risk factors of ICD were younger age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-0.97, p 0.001), being single (AOR: 0.15, 95%CI: 0.03-0.84, p 0.03), and a positive history of psychiatric illness (AOR: 7.67, 95% CI: 1.37-42.97, p 0.021). CONCLUSION: ICDs with a broad range of psychiatric symptoms are common in individuals with DA-treated prolactinoma and NFPAs. Endocrinologists should be aware of this potential side effect, particularly in patients with a personal history of psychiatric disorder.


Assuntos
Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Neoplasias Hipofisárias , Prolactinoma , Humanos , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/tratamento farmacológico , Prolactinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/epidemiologia , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Eur J Neurol ; 31(2): e16144, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37955562

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Impulse control disorders (ICDs) are common among Parkinson's disease patients using dopamine agonists. We wanted to determine whether ICD patients have higher dopamine agonist serum concentrations than those without any sign of ICD. METHODS: Patients who used either pramipexole or ropinirole depot once daily were screened for ICDs using the validated Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease-Rating Scale. Those who scored above the cut-off for one or more of the four defined ICDs (gambling, compulsive sexual behavior, compulsive shopping, and binge-eating) were compared in a case-control study to patients who scored zero points (no evidence of ICD) on the same items. They were examined clinically and evaluated using relevant scales. Three blood samples were taken on the same day: before daily dose, and then 6 and 12 h later. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were included: 19 ICD-positive and 27 controls. Ropinirole serum concentrations 6 h after daily intake (Cmax ) were higher in the case group compared to the control group, as was the daily ropinirole dosage. No differences were observed in serum concentrations, dosage or total drug exposure for pramipexole. Disease duration and length of dopamine agonist treatment was significantly longer among ICD patients for ropinirole, but not for pramipexole. CONCLUSIONS: The use of pramipexole may in itself confer high ICD risk, whereas ICDs among ropinirole users depend more on serum concentration and drug exposure. The pharmacokinetic properties of ropinirole make it challenging to predict its effects on patients, which supports the need for therapeutic drug monitoring to reduce risk of ICD.


Assuntos
Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Doença de Parkinson , Humanos , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Pramipexol/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico
3.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 44(1): 39-48, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38011021

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests an association between third-generation antipsychotics (TGAs) and impulse control disorders (ICDs). This is thought to be due to their partial agonism of dopamine receptors. However, neither the relative nor absolute risks of ICDs in those prescribed TGAs are well established. To inform clinical practice, this systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes and quantifies the current evidence for an association. METHODS: An electronic search of Medline, PsychINFO, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Clinical Trials Database was undertaken from database inception to November 2022. Three reviewers screened abstracts and reviewed full texts for inclusion. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted with eligible studies. RESULTS: A total of 392 abstracts were retrieved, 214 remained after duplicates were removed. Fifteen full texts were reviewed, of which 8 were included. All 8 studies found that TGAs were associated with increased probability of ICDs. Risk of bias was high or critical in 7 of 8 studies. Three studies were included in the pooled analysis for the primary outcome, 2 with data on each of aripiprazole, cariprazine, and brexpiprazole. Exposure to TGAs versus other antipsychotics was associated with an increase in ICDs (pooled odds ratio, 5.54; 2.24-13.68). Cariprazine and brexpiprazole were significantly associated with ICDs when analyzed individually. Aripiprazole trended toward increased risk, but very wide confidence intervals included no effect. CONCLUSIONS: Third-generation antipsychotics were associated with increased risk of ICDs in all studies included and pooled analysis. However, the risk of bias is high, confidence intervals are wide, and the quality of evidence is very low for all TGAs examined.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Humanos , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Aripiprazol/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco
4.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 117: 105918, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37922636

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Impulse control disorders (ICD) in Parkinson's disease (PD) and hypomanic episodes of bipolar disorder show overlapping symptoms, suggesting a shared neurobiology. To explore this, the following hypotheses are tested: (1) larger changes in affective symptoms from OFF to ON medication states will be associated with ICD, (2) antidepressant exposure will be associated with larger OFF to ON affective symptom changes, and (3) antidepressant exposure will be associated with ICD. METHODS: 200 participants (mean age 65, 61 % male) were evaluated in "off" and "on" dopamine states. Affective symptoms were captured using the Hamilton Anxiety and Depression Rating Scales. Differences in clinical outcomes were compared using two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Pearson χ2 tests. We performed multivariable logistic regression to assess the association of antidepressant exposure on ICD. RESULTS: Participants with an ICD had higher anxiety and depressive scores in "on" and "off" states and larger changes in depressive symptoms from OFF to ON states compared to those without an ICD. Participants on antidepressants had higher anxiety scores in "on" and "off" states, higher depressive scores in the "off" state, and larger changes in anxiety symptoms from OFF to ON states than those not on an antidepressant. Antidepressant use was associated with a higher odds of an ICD (OR 2.3, CI [1.0-4.5], p-value 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Affective symptom severity in "on" and "off" dopamine states is associated with ICD. Antidepressant therapy may be associated with ICD. Future prospective studies clarifying temporal associations between antidepressant initiation and ICD emergence are needed.


Assuntos
Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Doença de Parkinson , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/psicologia , Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico
5.
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep ; 43(4): 650-653, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37921065

RESUMO

We present the case of a patient, a boy of 16 years of age at initial presentation, with kleptomania, an impulse disorder characterized by an impulse to steal unneeded items, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The patient's parents reported that he would frequently impulsively steal items and money that he did not need. Cognitive and physical assessments revealed no abnormalities, and the patient had no history of substance abuse. The patient was diagnosed with kleptomania and ADHD. The patient was started on Osmotic Release Oral System Methylphenidate (OROS-MPH), a medication commonly used to treat ADHD, and experienced improvement in ADHD symptoms and stealing behavior. At 19 years of age, it was discovered that the patient's behavioral symptoms were uncontrolled during times of the day when the blood concentration of MPH was likely to have waned. After starting an additional dose of guanfacine at night, his symptoms during these times of day improved. While existing research is not definitive, there may be a connection between ADHD and kleptomania. Further, there are some reports that treatment of ADHD with MPH also reduced stealing behavior, aligning with our present findings. We discuss the potential mechanisms behind these improvements and further present the first evidence of the efficacy of guanfacine in the treatment of kleptomania.


Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Metilfenidato , Masculino , Humanos , Adolescente , Metilfenidato/uso terapêutico , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/psicologia , Guanfacina/uso terapêutico , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Preparações de Ação Retardada/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico
6.
J Neurol ; 270(10): 4851-4859, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37338615

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Impulse control disorders (ICDs) are frequently encountered in Parkinson's disease (PD). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess whether clonidine, an α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, would improve ICDs. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre trial in five movement disorder departments. Patients with PD and ICDs (n = 41) were enrolled in an 8-week, randomised (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study of clonidine (75 µg twice a day). Randomisation and allocation to the trial group were carried out by a central computer system. The primary outcome was the change at 8 weeks in symptom severity using the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease-Rating Scale (QUIP-RS) score. A reduction of the most elevated subscore of the QUIP-RS of more than 3 points without any increase in the other QUIP-RS dimension defined success. RESULTS: Between 15 May 2019 and 10 September 2021, 19 patients in the clonidine group and 20 patients in the placebo group were enrolled. The proportion difference of success in reducing QUIP-RS at 8 weeks, was 7% (one-sided upper 90% CI 27%) with 42.1% of success in the clonidine group and 35.0% in the placebo group. Compared to patients in the placebo group, patients in the clonidine group experienced a greater reduction in the total QUIP-RS score at 8 weeks (11.0 points vs. 3.6). DISCUSSION: Clonidine was well tolerated but our study was not enough powerful to demonstrate significant superiority compared to placebo in reducing ICDs despite a greater reduction of total QUIP score at 8 weeks. A phase 3 study should be conducted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered (NCT03552068) on clinicaltrials.gov on June 11, 2018.


Assuntos
Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Doença de Parkinson , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Clonidina/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/etiologia , Comportamento Impulsivo , Método Duplo-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Neurol India ; 71(1): 107-112, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36861582

RESUMO

Impulse control disorders (ICDs) are less-emphasized adverse effects of dopamine agonists. Evidence on prevalence and predictors of ICDs in patients with prolactinomas is limited and confined chiefly to cross-sectional studies. This was a prospective study performed to investigate ICDs in treatment-naïve patients with macroprolactinomas (n = 15) using cabergoline (Group I), compared to consecutive patients of nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas (n = 15) (Group II). Clinical, biochemical, radiological parameters and psychiatric comorbidities were evaluated at baseline. ICD was assessed by Minnesota impulsive disorder interview, modified hypersexuality and punding questionnaires, South Oaks gambling scale, kleptomania symptom assessment scale, Barratt impulsive scale (BIS), and internet addiction scores (IAS) at baseline and 12 weeks. Group I had a significantly lower mean age (28.5 vs. 42.2 years) with a female predominance (60%) compared to group II. Median tumor volume was lower in group I (4.92 vs. 14 cm3) despite significantly longer symptom duration (2.13 vs. 0.80 years) than in group II. Serum prolactin decreased by 86% (P = 0.006) and tumor volume decreased by 56% (P = 0.004) at 12 weeks in group I, with a mean weekly cabergoline dose of 0.40 ± 0.13 mg. There was no difference between both groups in hypersexuality, gambling, punding, and kleptomania symptom assessment scale scores at baseline and 12 weeks. Mean BIS showed a more remarkable change in group I (16.2% vs. 8.4%, P = 0.051), and 38.5% of patients transitioned from average to above-average IAS in group I. The current study found no increased risk of ICD with short-term use of cabergoline in patients with macroprolactinomas. The use of age-appropriate scores (such as IAS in younger individuals) may help diagnose subtle alterations in impulsivity.


Assuntos
Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Neoplasias Hipofisárias , Prolactinoma , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Cabergolina/uso terapêutico , Prolactinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Transversais , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/tratamento farmacológico
11.
Cogn Behav Neurol ; 36(1): 1-8, 2023 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36149404

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported an increase in the incidence of impulse control disorders (ICDs) in patient groups treated with dopamine agonists (DAAs), especially in Parkinson disease (PD). However, very few studies have reported on ICDs in individuals with a prolactinoma who were treated with DAAs. OBJECTIVE: To see whether a DAA by itself causes ICDs in individuals with a prolactinoma by controlling the susceptibility to impulsivity by excluding individuals with other risk factors for ICDs. METHOD: We compared the performance of 31 individuals with a prolactinoma receiving DAA therapy (DAA+) on various behavioral scales and the Iowa gambling task (IGT), a neuropsychological instrument that measures risky decision-making, with the performance of 20 individuals with a prolactinoma who were not on DAA therapy (DAA-) and 30 healthy controls (HC). RESULTS: There was no significant difference among the groups concerning performance on the Zuckerman Sensation Seeking Scale-V, Minnesota Impulse Disorders Interview, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11, or IGT. No correlation was found between the scores on these scales and the duration or dose of DAA in the DAA+ group. The incidence of ICDs was 25.8% in the DAA+ group, 15% in the DAA- group, and 16.7% in the HC. The differences among the groups did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Individuals who are under treatment with low-dose, D 2 -selective DAAs for a prolactinoma do not face an increased risk for ICDs, especially when they are carefully screened for any psychiatric comorbidity that may also display impulsivity.


Assuntos
Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Hepatite C Crônica , Neoplasias Hipofisárias , Prolactinoma , Humanos , Prolactinoma/induzido quimicamente , Prolactinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/tratamento farmacológico
12.
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 77(3): 160-167, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36436204

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Impulse control disorders (e.g. pathological gambling, hypersexuality) may develop as adverse reactions to drugs. Pathogenetic hypotheses have mainly focused on D3-receptor agonism, and switching to alternatives with different pharmacologic mechanisms represents a common management strategy. Nonetheless, treatment failure is common and gaining pathophysiological insights is needed. AIM: We aimed to identify targets potentially contributing to pathologic impulsivity. METHOD: We performed a pharmacovigilance-pharmacodynamic study on dopamine agonists and antipsychotics using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (January 2004-December 2021). We estimated disproportionate reporting using the Bayesian information component. Using online public databases (IUPHAR, ChEMBL, PDSP, DrugBank), we calculated drug occupancies. To identify the targets potentially contributing to impulsivity, we fitted univariate regression models interpolating information components and occupancies within dopamine agonists and antipsychotics. Sensitivity analyses were performed to check for the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Among 19 887 reports of impulsivity, 5898 recorded an antipsychotic, and 3100 a dopamine agonist. The more robust signals concerned aripiprazole (N = 3091; median information component [95% confidence interval] = 4.51[4.45-4.55]) and brexpiprazole (229; 4.00[3.78-4.16]) for antipsychotics, pergolide (105; 5.82[5.50-6.06]) and pramipexole (2009; 5.43[5.36-5.48]) for dopamine agonists. Robust, significant positive associations between drug occupancy and impulsivity reporting were found for D3 within dopamine agonists (beta = 1.52; P-value = 0.047) and 5-HT1a within antipsychotics (1.92, 0.029). CONCLUSION: Our results supported the role of D3-receptor agonism in inducing impulsivity in dopamine receptor agonists and identified a potential role of 5-HT1a receptor agonism in antipsychotics. Investigating these receptors may drive towards a better management of drug-induced impulsivity.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Humanos , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Farmacovigilância , Teorema de Bayes , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico
13.
Rev Endocr Metab Disord ; 23(5): 1089-1099, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36125673

RESUMO

Dopamine agonists (DAs) represent a mainstay of therapy for hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas. The widespread use of DAs, including bromocriptine, cabergoline and (in some countries) quinagolide, has led to the emergence and recognition of impulse control disorders (ICDs) that may occur in association with DA therapy.Such ICDs include pathological gambling, compulsive shopping, hypersexuality and punding (the performance of repetitive tasks), among others. These manifestations can lead to substantial harms to patients and their families, if left undiagnosed and untreated. Several risk factors that may increase the risk of ICDs have been proposed, including younger age, male gender, smoking and alcohol use and history of depression.The diagnosis of ICDs in hyperprolactinemic patients treated with DAs requires a high index of suspicion and a systematic approach, using available screening questionnaires. However, it should be noted that available test instruments, including questionnaires and computerized tasks, have not been validated specifically in hyperprolactinemic patients. Hyperprolactinemic patients who develop ICDs should be withdrawn from DA therapy or, at a minimum, undergo a DA dose reduction, and considered for psychiatric consultation and cognitive behavioral therapy. However, the role of psychopharmacotherapy in hyperprolactinemic patients with ICDs remains incompletely characterized.Patient counseling regarding the risk of ICDs occurring in association with DA therapy, early detection and prompt intervention may mitigate potential harms associated with ICDs. Additional studies are needed to fully characterize risk factors, underlying mechanisms and identify effective therapies for ICDs in patients with hyperprolactinemia receiving DAs.


Assuntos
Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Hiperprolactinemia , Neoplasias Hipofisárias , Bromocriptina/efeitos adversos , Cabergolina/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hiperprolactinemia/induzido quimicamente , Hiperprolactinemia/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/tratamento farmacológico
14.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 216: 107237, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35395562

RESUMO

Impulse control disorder (ICD) has been linked to dopamine agonist use in patients with Parkinson's disease. Increased creativity is another cognitive side effect of dopaminergic therapy. While ICD is well recognized in the literature, enhanced creativity as a positive phenomenon is underreported because it does not negatively affect the patients' quality of life. Herein, we report a case of a 49-year-old man with Parkinson's disease who developed enhanced creativity expressed by the acquisition of multiple, new artistic skills with ropinirole treatment. He spent a significant amount of time on painting, carving and axe restoration, selling these artistic products became a source of income. He also reports that these hobbies help him cope with physical limitations caused by Parkinson's disease.


Assuntos
Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Doença de Parkinson , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Qualidade de Vida , Dopamina , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/complicações , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico
15.
BMC Endocr Disord ; 22(1): 97, 2022 Apr 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35410236

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recently, side effects from Dopamine Receptor Agonist Drugs (DAs) in treating pituitary prolactinoma have raised widespread concern. This study explores the incidence and influencing factors of DAs-related side effects in Chinese prolactinoma patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted. 51 prolactinoma patients treated with DAs, 12 prolactinoma or pituitary microadenoma patients without DAs treatment, and 33 healthy controls were included. The Barratt impulsivity scale-11, Patient Health Questionnaire 9, and the ICD screening questionnaire were all used to evaluate the psychological and physical side effects of DAs. Clinical data of all subjects were collected from their electronic medical records. RESULTS: The incidence of ICDs in the treated group, the untreated group, and control group was 9.8% (5/51), 16.7% (2/12), and 9.1% (3/33), respectively. In the treated group in particular, there were 1 patient (2%, 1/51), 2 patients (3.9%, 2/51), and 2 patients (3.9%, 2/51) with positive screening for punding, compulsive shopping, and hypersexuality, respectively. In terms of depression, the incidence of "minimal", "mild" and "moderate" depression in the treated group was 62.8% (32/51), 25.5% (13/51), and 5.9% (3/51), respectively. The incidence of physical symptoms was 51.0% (26/51) in the treated group and gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common symptoms (33.3%, 17/51). In addition, we found that the various parameters of DAs treatment had no association with the occurrence of physical symptoms or ICDs (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Chinese prolactinoma patients treated with DAs had a lower incidence of ICDs (9.8%), while gastrointestinal symptoms were common. In this way, more attention should be paid to side effects, especially physical symptoms, in Chinese prolactinoma patients with DAs therapy during follow-up regardless of dose.


Assuntos
Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Neoplasias Hipofisárias , Prolactinoma , China/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/epidemiologia , Prolactinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Prolactinoma/epidemiologia
16.
Lakartidningen ; 1192022 03 14.
Artigo em Sueco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35285933

RESUMO

Impulse control disorders (ICD) may occur with the use of dopamine agonists (DAA), a class of medication usually prescribed for Parkinson's disease but also restless legs syndrome (RLS) and prolactinoma.  We describe a case that illustrates, in consistence with international literature, how exposure to DAA for treatment of RLS can lead to suffering of ICD with devastating consequences. Discontinuation of the dopaminergic agent (and potentially switching to another medication of a different class) can be an effective management strategy, and we suggest that it is very important to improve the knowledge of this phenomenon among clinicians and prompt active screening for ICD in this population.


Assuntos
Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Doença de Parkinson , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/epidemiologia
17.
Psychiatry Res ; 311: 114499, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35305343

RESUMO

There are currently no evidence-based treatment recommendations for impulse control disorders, which include intermittent explosive disorder (IED), kleptomania and pyromania. Therefore, this systematic review sought to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated pharmacological treatments for impulse control disorders, to evaluate their efficacy and tolerability. Searches were conducted within MEDLINE, PsychINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases. Eight studies were included, six investigated pharmacotherapies for IED, while two investigated management for kleptomania. For the treatment of IED, oxcarbazepine and fluoxetine were the most efficacious. Importantly, divalproex was not superior to placebo in decreasing IED symptoms and was associated with significant adverse effects. In the treatment of kleptomania, only naltrexone was effective. The existing data suggest that the pharmacological treatment for impulse control disorders is an understudied area of psychiatry. Much of the current research on impulse control disorders focuses on management with anticonvulsants and antidepressants. Further studies conducted on these interventions in this population may yield promising results.


Assuntos
Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico , Fluoxetina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Ácido Valproico
19.
Rev. neurol. (Ed. impr.) ; 72(9): 323-332, May 1, 2021.
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-227874

RESUMO

Introducción: La apomorfina, agonista dopaminérgico D1 y D2, es el fármaco más antiguo con efectividad en el tratamiento de la enfermedad de Parkinson (EP) y el único de potencia análoga a la levodopa. Su utilidad, tanto en la administración intermitente como en la perfusión continua en el control de las fluctuaciones motoras, está demostrada tanto en estudios abiertos como controlados. Objetivo: Analizar el papel de la apomorfina en las distintas manifestaciones y momentos evolutivos de la EP mediante una revisión narrativa de la literatura científica (1951-2020). Desarrollo: Más allá del aumento de la duración del on, la reducción del off, la mejoría de la distonía en off y la calidad de vida en pacientes con EP avanzada, existe evidencia de la efectividad de la apomorfina en áreas menos conocidas de la EP, como síntomas no motores, menor riesgo de inducir trastornos de control de impulsos, potencial para atenuar las alucinaciones visuales, mejora de la clínica neuropsiquiátrica asociada a la EP, ayuda a un mejor control de las discinesias o influencia en los síntomas axiales. Sin embargo, el momento óptimo de su instauración sigue siendo objeto de debate, y existen varios factores que históricamente han limitado el uso de este valioso fármaco. Conclusiones: La apomorfina es un fármaco con propiedades únicas dentro del abanico de posibilidades para tratar la EP, con potenciales aplicaciones más allá del control de las fluctuaciones motoras. Conocerlas para indicarlas a los pacientes que más puedan beneficiarse de ellos, así como valorar adecuadamente el estadio de la EP en que iniciar la apomorfina, puede ser clave para mejorar el control clínico de esta compleja patología.(AU)


Introduction: Apomorphine, a D1-D2 dopamine agonist, is the oldest drug with proven efficacy in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD), and the only with similar symptomatic power to levodopa. Its usefulness in the control of motor fluctuations, both as intermittent injections and in continuous subcutaneous infusion, has been demonstrated in open label and placebo controlled trials. Aim: To analyse the role of apomorphine in the varied clinical symptoms and different clinical stages of PD through a narrative review of scientific literature (1951-2020). Development: Beyond on-time increase, off-time decrease, off dystonia and quality of life improvement in advanced PD, there is evidence to support a role of apomorphine in less known clinical areas of PD, such as non motor symptoms, a lower risk of impulse control disorders, potential to ameliorate visual hallucinations, improve neuropsychiatric symptoms and dyskinesia and even axial features. Nevertheless, the optimal timing of apomorphine treatment remains controversial, and its implementation of this valuable drug in clinical practice has been historically hindered by several factors. Conclusions: Apomorphine is a unique drug in the PD treatment scenario, with a number of potential applications beyond motor fluctuations control. Acknowledging these properties, selecting the patient most likely to benefit from it and finding the right timing may be key in the symptomatic control of this complex disease.(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Apomorfina/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Cognição , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico , Apomorfina/análogos & derivados , Apomorfina/administração & dosagem , Apomorfina/farmacologia , Doença de Parkinson/prevenção & controle , Alucinações , Comportamento Aditivo
20.
Neurol Sci ; 42(7): 2673-2682, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33852081

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: A significant proportion of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) display a set of impulsive-compulsive behaviors at some point during the course of illness. These behaviors range from the so-called behavioral addictions to dopamine dysregulation syndrome, punding and hoarding disorders. These behaviors have been consistently linked to the use of dopaminergic medications used to treat PD motor symptoms (dopamine agonists, levodopa, and other agents) and less consistently to neuromodulation techniques such as deep brain stimulation (DBS). Since there are still no approved treatments for these conditions, their pharmacological management is still a big challenge for clinicians. METHODS: We conducted an extensive review of current pharmacological and neuromodulation literature for the management of impulsive-compulsive disorders in PD patients. RESULTS: Pharmacological treatment approaches for impulsive-compulsive behaviors and DDS in PD patients include reduction of levodopa (LD), reduction/cessation of dopamine agonist (DA), and initiation of infusion therapies (apomorphine infusion and duodopa). Also, atomoxetine, a noradrenergic agent approved for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, showed some interesting preliminary results but there is still a lack of controlled longitudinal studies. Finally, while DBS effects on impulsive-compulsive disorders are still controversial, non-invasive techniques (such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation) could have a potential positive effect but, again, there is still a lack of controlled trials. CONCLUSION: Managing impulsivity and compulsivity in PD patients is still a non-evidence-based challenge for clinicians. Controlled trials on promising approaches such as atomoxetine and non-invasive neuromodulation techniques are needed.


Assuntos
Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Doença de Parkinson , Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua , Comportamento Compulsivo/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/etiologia , Agonistas de Dopamina , Humanos , Comportamento Impulsivo , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...